JOIN BOOKISH.COM FOR ACCESS TO MORE BOOK EXCLUSIVES!

The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks

By

Paperback published by Large Print Press (Thorndike Press)

Larger Image
304 Ratings. What's Yours?
Histogram_reset_icon
(194REVIEWS)
ADD TO MY SHELF
About This Book
Her name was Henrietta Lacks, but scientists know her as HeLa. She was a poor Southern tobacco farmer who worked the same land as her slave ancestors, yet her cells—taken without her knowledge—became one of the most important tools in medicine. The first “immortal” human cells grown in culture, they are still alive today, though she has been dead for more than sixty years. If you could pile all HeLa cells ever grown onto a scale, they’d weigh more than 50 million metric tons—as much as a hundred Empire State Buildings. HeLa cells were vital for developing the polio vaccine; uncovered secrets of cancer, viruses, and the atom bomb’s effects; helped lead to important advances like in vitro fertilization, cloning, and gene mapping; and have been bought and sold by the billions.

Yet Henrietta Lacks remains virtually unknown, buried in an unmarked grave.

Now Rebecca Skloot takes us on an extraordinary journey, from the “colored” ward of Johns Hopkins Hospital in the 1950s to stark white laboratories with freezers full of HeLa cells; from Henrietta’s small, dying hometown of Clover, Virginia—a land of wooden slave quarters, faith healings, and voodoo—to East Baltimore today, where her children and grandchildren live and struggle with the legacy of her cells.

Henrietta’s family did not learn of her “immortality” until more than twenty years after her death, when scientists investigating HeLa began using her husband and children in research without informed consent. And though the cells had launched a multimillion-dollar industry that sells human biological materials, her family never saw any of the profits. As Rebecca Skloot so brilliantly shows, the story of the Lacks family—past and present—is inextricably connected to the dark history of experimentation on African Americans, the birth of bioethics, and the legal battles over whether we control the stuff we are made of.

Over the decade it took to uncover this story, Rebecca became enmeshed in the lives of the Lacks family—especially Henrietta’s daughter Deborah, who was devastated to learn about her mother’s cells. She was consumed with questions: Had scientists cloned her mother? Did it hurt her when researchers infected her cells with viruses and shot them into space? What happened to her sister, Elsie, who died in a mental institution at the age of fifteen? And if her mother was so important to medicine, why couldn’t her children afford health insurance? 
          
Intimate in feeling, astonishing in scope, and impossible to put down, The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks captures the beauty and drama of scientific discovery, as well as its human consequences.
Show less
Her name was Henrietta Lacks, but scientists know her as HeLa. She was a poor Southern tobacco farmer who worked the same land as her slave ancestors, yet her cells—taken without her knowledge—became one of the most important tools in medicine. The first “immortal” human cells grown in culture, they are still alive today, though she has been dead for more than sixty years. If you could pile all HeLa cells ever grown onto a scale, they’d weigh more than 50 million metric tons—as much as a hundred Empire State Buildings. HeLa cells were vital for developing the polio vaccine; uncovered secrets of cancer, viruses, and the atom bomb’s effects; helped lead to important advances like in vitro fertilization, cloning, and gene mapping; and have been bought and sold by the billions.

Yet Henrietta Lacks remains virtually unknown, buried in an unmarked grave.

Now Rebecca Skloot takes us on an extraordinary journey, from the “colored” ward of Johns Hopkins Hospital in the 1950s to stark white laboratories with freezers full of HeLa cells; from Henrietta’s small, dying hometown of Clover, Virginia—a land of wooden slave quarters, faith healings, and voodoo—to East Baltimore today, where her children and grandchildren live and struggle with the legacy of her cells.

Henrietta’s family did not learn of her “immortality” until more than twenty years after her death, when scientists investigating HeLa began using her husband and children in research without informed consent. And though the cells had launched a multimillion-dollar industry that sells human biological materials, her family never saw any of the profits. As Rebecca Skloot so brilliantly shows, the story of the Lacks family—past and present—is inextricably connected to the dark history of experimentation on African Americans, the birth of bioethics, and the legal battles over whether we control the stuff we are made of.

Over the decade it took to uncover this story, Rebecca became enmeshed in the lives of the Lacks family—especially Henrietta’s daughter Deborah, who was devastated to learn about her mother’s cells. She was consumed with questions: Had scientists cloned her mother? Did it hurt her when researchers infected her cells with viruses and shot them into space? What happened to her sister, Elsie, who died in a mental institution at the age of fifteen? And if her mother was so important to medicine, why couldn’t her children afford health insurance? 
          
Intimate in feeling, astonishing in scope, and impossible to put down, The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks captures the beauty and drama of scientific discovery, as well as its human consequences.
Product Details
Paperback (604 pages)
Published: May 3, 2011
Publisher: Thorndike Press
Imprint: Large Print Press
ISBN: 9781594134326
Other books byRebecca Skloot
  • The Best American Science Writing 2011

    The Best American Science Writing 2011
    Edited by Rebecca Skloot, award-winning science writer and New York Times bestselling author of The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks, and her father, Floyd Skloot, an award-winning poet and writer, and past contributor to the series, The Best American Science Writing 2011 collects into one volume the most crucial, thought-provoking, and engaging science writing of the year. Culled from a wide variety of publications, these selections of outstanding journalism cover the full spectrum of scientific inquiry, providing a comprehensive overview of the most compelling, relevant, and exciting developments in the world of science. Provocative and engaging, The Best American Science Writing 2011 reveals just how far science has brought us—and where it is headed next.

BookishEssential List

THIS BOOK IS ON 1 BOOKISH LIST:

Favorite QuotesFROM THIS BOOK
Quote Cannot be Empty

Submitted quotes are usually posted within 48 hours

ThanksYour Quote Will be posted Shortly
BookReviews
194 Total Reviews

Showing reviews with all ratings. View reviews with:

All Ratings(x)5 Stars(x)4 Stars(x)3 Stars(x)2 Stars1 Star

See Reviews From:

EveryOne(194)Readers(193)Critics(1)

Most Helpful
REVIEWS

  • Posted Just Now

     

  • December 27, 2012
    LibraryThing User

    This was the authors first novel. Interesting story about the origin of the Hela cell culture. Introduces the topic of tissue ownership. Good of science versus personal ownership of your body parts once they are removed.

    Show less

    This was the authors first novel. Interesting story about the origin of the Hela cell culture. Introduces the topic of tissue ownership. Good of science versus personal ownership of your body parts once they are removed.


    Was this review helpful to you? Helpful|Not Helpful


  • December 18, 2012
    LibraryThing User

    For a non-fiction book, The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks was surprisingly interesting to read. I found it frustrating to learn about the treatment of Henrietta as a cancer patient as well as the treatment of her family long after she had died. HeLa cells have been the foundation of research for decades, all made possible by the unknown removal and use of Henrietta's cervical cancer cells early in her diagnosis. Research on many illnesses and cures for many diseases have been possible because of Henrietta's special cells that are still alive today, used in laboratories throughout the world. This amazing book should be read by everyone and everyone should thank this poor black tobacco farmer whose cells have made the world a better, healthier place.

    Show less

    For a non-fiction book, The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks was surprisingly interesting to read. I found it frustrating to learn about the treatment of Henrietta as a cancer patient as well as the treatment of her family long after she had died. HeLa cells have been the foundation of research for decades, all made possible by the unknown removal and use of Henrietta's cervical cancer cells early in her diagnosis. Research on many illnesses and cures for many diseases have been possible because of Henrietta's special cells that are still alive today, used in laboratories throughout the world. This amazing book should be read by everyone and everyone should thank this poor black tobacco farmer whose cells have made the world a better, healthier place.


    Was this review helpful to you? Helpful|Not Helpful


  • December 09, 2012
    LibraryThing User

    It's impossible to read The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks without thinking about the issues surrounding medical research, human subjects and informed consent, medical ethics, and the doctor/patient relationship. In one way, Henrietta Lacks probably wasn't any different than hundreds of other patients at the time. It seems clear that doctors had been taking tissue samples from patients and attempting to grow them for quite some time. Henrietta's were different because they didn't die, but continued to grow.I admired Henrietta's daughter, Deborah's, persistence in trying to find out what happened to her mother's cells and what this meant for her family. I also sympathized with some of the medical professionals who, it seems, with good intentions tried to provide an explanation. Deborah and many of her relatives lacked the formal education that would have provided the foundation for that understanding, and most of the scientists couldn't seem to explain cell biology in lay terms. (I have less sympathy for those who were too impatient or arrogant to try to communicate with the family.) Deborah's life-long effort to educate herself about her mother's cells is inspirational.Rebecca Skloot alternates between first and third person in telling Henrietta's story and placing it within the context of medical research and ethics. Her use of first person made me uncomfortable. I felt like the author was inserting herself into Henrietta's story. It has the appearance of one more person exploiting the family for personal gain. There is so much of Deborah's voice in the story that I would have liked to have seen her credited as a co-author.Although the book caused me to reflect on the issues it raised, it didn't change my opinion about the issues involved. I tend to side with medical research. I want medical science to advance so that future generations may benefit from cures for cancer, Alzheimer's, AIDS, and other diseases that impact so many families. If tissue samples taken during medically necessary procedures can help to advance medical science, I want my tissue to be used for that purpose. Current protocols seem adequate for preventing experimentation on human subjects without their consent, either by introducing pathogens or withholding treatment. Given the difficulties of convincing third-party insurers to pay for medically necessary procedures, it would be extremely difficult to convince them to pay for an unnecessary medical procedure for the purpose of extracting tissue or organs for research. Since medical advances often raise unanticipated ethical questions, it's important that we continue to examine and re-examine issues affecting patient rights. It's books like Skloot's that keep this important conversation going.

    Show less

    It's impossible to read The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks without thinking about the issues surrounding medical research, human subjects and informed consent, medical ethics, and the doctor/patient relationship. In one way, Henrietta Lacks probably wasn't any different than hundreds of other patients at the time. It seems clear that doctors had been taking tissue samples from patients and attempting to grow them for quite some time. Henrietta's were different because they didn't die, but continued to grow.I admired Henrietta's daughter, Deborah's, persistence in trying to find out what happened to her mother's cells and what this meant for her family. I also sympathized with some of the medical professionals who, it seems, with good intentions tried to provide an explanation. Deborah and many of her relatives lacked the formal education that would have provided the foundation for that understanding, and most of the scientists couldn't seem to explain cell biology in lay terms. (I have less sympathy for those who were too impatient or arrogant to try to communicate with the family.) Deborah's life-long effort to educate herself about her mother's cells is inspirational.Rebecca Skloot alternates between first and third person in telling Henrietta's story and placing it within the context of medical research and ethics. Her use of first person made me uncomfortable. I felt like the author was inserting herself into Henrietta's story. It has the appearance of one more person exploiting the family for personal gain. There is so much of Deborah's voice in the story that I would have liked to have seen her credited as a co-author.Although the book caused me to reflect on the issues it raised, it didn't change my opinion about the issues involved. I tend to side with medical research. I want medical science to advance so that future generations may benefit from cures for cancer, Alzheimer's, AIDS, and other diseases that impact so many families. If tissue samples taken during medically necessary procedures can help to advance medical science, I want my tissue to be used for that purpose. Current protocols seem adequate for preventing experimentation on human subjects without their consent, either by introducing pathogens or withholding treatment. Given the difficulties of convincing third-party insurers to pay for medically necessary procedures, it would be extremely difficult to convince them to pay for an unnecessary medical procedure for the purpose of extracting tissue or organs for research. Since medical advances often raise unanticipated ethical questions, it's important that we continue to examine and re-examine issues affecting patient rights. It's books like Skloot's that keep this important conversation going.


    Was this review helpful to you? Helpful|Not Helpful


Bookish